|
Post by sgev1977 on Jan 4, 2019 20:57:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sgev1977 on Jan 5, 2019 0:04:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sgev1977 on Jan 5, 2019 14:15:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sgev1977 on Jan 6, 2019 0:46:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sgev1977 on Jan 6, 2019 0:52:58 GMT
I can’t believe that article just answered my recent question about Jeremy Corbyn’s role in the film!
Anyway, great article!
|
|
|
Post by sgev1977 on Jan 6, 2019 12:46:05 GMT
Interesting article with opinions of the movies “by insiders”. Some of them are happier than other about the movie. The hardest critic is the whistleblower who wanted all the allegedly illegal stuff on screen.
|
|
|
Post by sgev1977 on Jan 6, 2019 15:26:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sgev1977 on Jan 6, 2019 18:54:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sgev1977 on Jan 6, 2019 21:11:21 GMT
Interesting article with opinions of the movies “by insiders”. Some of them are happier than other about the movie. The hardest critic is the whistleblower who wanted all the allegedly illegal stuff on screen. This is actually a review but I decided posted it here because it also criticize the film for not included “important” stuff that incriminate... Remainers! It’s, of course, by a pro-Brexit site and it claims it’s clear it’s a work by Remainers. brexitcentral.com/take-channel-4s-brexit-uncivil-war/Both extremes not being happy not because something ON screen BUT about something that’s NOT on screen (and in particular something that is actually (probably) illegal to include: a direct accusation of crime). One of the main capital crimes in film criticism but they are not professional film critics so... We have to wait and see but I suspect the film is not about expose or confirm crimes but about the anger and division. As someone said it is not an investigative work.
|
|
|
Post by sgev1977 on Jan 6, 2019 23:06:43 GMT
|
|