|
Post by sgev1977 on May 25, 2018 18:15:08 GMT
|
|
|
Post by onebluestocking on May 25, 2018 19:19:25 GMT
What an odd article. Laughing at "tree-climbing feet."
|
|
|
Post by queenzod on May 25, 2018 20:21:49 GMT
Can there please be ONE article, sometime, somewhere, that doesn’t use the term Cumberbitches? 🙄
I know it’s supposed to have that gonzo flavor, Rolling Stone and all, but what a pile of mostly nonsense!
|
|
|
Post by mllemass on May 25, 2018 22:34:33 GMT
Even if I ignore the spelling and grammatical errors in the article, why do I have to keep reading about Benedict's appearance? It's such a waste of an interview! Now, if they put Benedict on their cover, maybe I can forgive them for this!
|
|
|
Post by sgev1977 on May 25, 2018 22:55:06 GMT
It's a very weird text. I guess they get away with it because they are Rolling Stone Magazine but even considering their irreverent style it's so weird.
There are a few factual errors, too!
|
|
|
Post by onebluestocking on May 26, 2018 1:04:40 GMT
I could have done without the entire paragraph from "is-a-cunt.com." Also, haters tearing into him for not attempting to rescue the boy (not) having an epileptic seizure in 3...2...1...
|
|
|
Post by roverpup on May 26, 2018 11:12:33 GMT
I could have done without the entire paragraph from "is-a-cunt.com." Also, haters tearing into him for not attempting to rescue the boy (not) having an epileptic seizure in 3...2...1... I could have done without that entire paragraph too and I would like to think that BC would have liked it if that part of the interview had just gone unasked as well. He seemed just slightly caught off guard by the line of questioning by this interviewer. A lot of the article was just filler - with endless re-treading lists of characters and movies he has done, pulling up old quotes and factoids and long, overblown descriptions of his appearance. I am beginning to suspect that the interview probably only lasted about 10 minutes or so. Apparently that writer has done other pieces in that same (or worse) style. But not to dwell on the negative too much and maybe in the hopes of ending on a more positive note (on what promises to be absolutely glorious day), I did like a couple of bits. The opening paragraph was lovely and lends itself to all sorts of vivid imaginings (him naked in bed because of his "jammies" being in the wash and his children "beckoning" him in the early morning). And I found his detailed explanation about his lack of addictive behaviour interesting. Which leads me to your ending sentence of your post OBS - about the Haters. What seems to have really got their GOAT 😉 is that bit about NOT taking heavy drugs! That flies in the face of a LOT of Gator's "theories" and she isn't taking this so well. Of course she is CONVINCED that the writer was just giving BC "shade" and was trying to make sure that the "SHAM" is now exposed for all the world (and not just those "enlightened" Haters) to see! 🙄🤣😑 :-))
|
|
|
Post by ellie on May 26, 2018 13:03:09 GMT
I’m obviously very prosaic but my thoughts about the revelation that he was naked in bed because his “jammies” were in the wash ” were why did he tell that to the journalist and does he only have one pair of “jammies?” Also I didn’t think the kids were with them on that trip.
|
|
|
Post by roverpup on May 26, 2018 13:38:13 GMT
I’m obviously very prosaic but my thoughts about the revelation that he was naked in bed because his “jammies” were in the wash ” were why did he tell that to the journalist and does he only have one pair of “jammies?” Also I didn’t think the kids were with them on that trip. Why do you say the children weren't with Sophie and Ben when the were in California? As far as the "jammie" count ... I don't know very many people who take more than one pair of sleepwear with them when the travel, honestly. Perhaps the more appropriate question would be just HOW did his jammies get in such a state that the needed to be washed! LOL! :-))
|
|
|
Post by ellie on May 26, 2018 14:53:22 GMT
I’m obviously very prosaic but my thoughts about the revelation that he was naked in bed because his “jammies” were in the wash ” were why did he tell that to the journalist and does he only have one pair of “jammies?” Also I didn’t think the kids were with them on that trip. Why do you say the children weren't with Sophie and Ben when the were in California? As far as the "jammie" count ... I don't know very many people who take more than one pair of sleepwear with them when the travel, honestly. Perhaps the more appropriate question would be just HOW did his jammies get in such a state that the needed to be washed! LOL! :-)) There were no pics or mention of the kids. The US paps usually get pics. Doesn’t men they weren’t there of course. As for nightwear I don’t know anybody who doesn’t take more than one set of sleepwear if they’re going to be away for more than a weekend. Anyway it’s of no great matter, they were just my first thoughts on reading the article. I mostly wonder why he felt it necessary to tell the journalist about his sleeping attire or lack thereof! 😄
|
|